129
IX. Was there any difficulty attending a signature by the Colonial Secretary under the repealed Ordinance 1 of 1838 and what? If this query have any relevancy to the reply, the case in dispute is very simple - that the Ordinance being repealed, the signature of the Colonial Secretary would be worthless. If it be not this case, its relevancy is hardly perceptible.
But as matter of fact I may note that Ordinance No. 1 of 1858 makes mention of, or provision for, the signature of the Colonial Secretary. Presuming that the repealed Ordinance No. 8 of 1845 is intended, I may further note that I have not been able to find any instance of the Colonial Secretary's signature having been given under that enactment.
410
"
129
IX. Was dive
any and what difficulty attending
a signature by the Colonial Secretory under
the repeated Ordinance of 1 of 1838
Awun. If this query
the reply
CaerAVL
The.
case in dispute,
vay simple- that the Ordinance
bring repeated, the signature of the Colonial Seculary world be worthless.
If it de
it de not
this case.
relevancy is handly peruptible.
Birt as matter of fact I may
ib-
nite
410
that Ordinance. M.) of 1858 makes mention of, or provision for, the signature of the Colonial Secretary. Presuming that the repeated Ordinance 1: 8 of 1845 is intended, I ́rnay failus note that Thave methuneledy
furiler of the Colonial Seculary's signaturs having
bun
evu...
given
under that enactment.
a
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.